Agents now write in minutes what takes hours to read. A small fix comes back touching a dozen files, and the mistakes that matter are architectural: they surface months later, when fixing them means understanding a lot of code nobody ever read.
The tools we had didn’t help much. A terminal shows a wall of text, an agent panel one message at a time, an editor one file at a time. Asking an assistant “how does this work?” answers one question and loses the big picture. We wanted to see the whole program first, then go straight to the part that changed.
You can’t see what the agent changed.
One task “could be touching 10, 15 different files”, and “from the terminal alone you really can’t see any of that.”
Sam Witteveen, “What is the Future of IDEs”Miradraws every change on the map: which sections a commit touched, what is new, changed or gone, and the lines under each.
Reviewing takes longer than writing.
45% of developers say debugging AI-generated code takes longer, and 66% say its answers are “almost right, but not quite.”
Stack Overflow, Developer Survey 2025Miralets you read at the right height: the steps the program takes first, then only the parts that changed, down to the line.
You own what you ship, whoever typed it.
“Accountability doesn’t transfer just because the authorship did.”
Isaac Levin, “Why We Still Need an IDE”, JetBrainsMirachecks every sentence on the map against the code it cites. What it couldn’t prove is marked, so you know what to read yourself.
Your agent is working blind too.
“An agent that can only grep through files … is often an agent that’s kind of working blind.”
Sam Witteveen, “What is the Future of IDEs”Mirais the agent’s context as well. Pick a section and it goes into the next prompt; Claude moves your view to the part it’s explaining.